| |
Main
Date: 30 Jun 2006 16:45:00
From: Dick Adams
Subject: KILL file for 'trn' on a Unix shell
|
I do not know to whom else this might apply, but here is what
I did.
Note that 'pico' is the editor I use.
pico News/rec/crafts/brewing/KILL
/soc.culture.indian/h :j
'h' means to search the headers and 'j' means junk when found.
It may not be the best solution or the most efficient solution,
but it works.
If it were up to me, the penalty for spamming would be a .45 caliber
sexual sterilization.
Dick - A member of JAS - The Jihad Against Spammers
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Jul 2006 20:52:51
From:
Subject: Re: KILL file for 'trn' on a Unix shell
|
I just ended up sending him a bunch of email telling him how much I enjoyed
eating hamburgers and steaks. He hasn't crossposted since then....knock on
wood.
"Dick Adams" <rdadams@smart.net > wrote in message
news:12aal8cbn6i5c1c@corp.supernews.com...
>I do not know to whom else this might apply, but here is what
> I did.
>
> Note that 'pico' is the editor I use.
>
> pico News/rec/crafts/brewing/KILL
>
> /soc.culture.indian/h :j
>
> 'h' means to search the headers and 'j' means junk when found.
> It may not be the best solution or the most efficient solution,
> but it works.
>
> If it were up to me, the penalty for spamming would be a .45 caliber
> sexual sterilization.
>
> Dick - A member of JAS - The Jihad Against Spammers
|
| |
Date: 03 Jul 2006 11:27:46
From: Don Levey
Subject: Re: KILL file for 'trn' on a Unix shell
|
rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams) writes:
>
> If it were up to me, the penalty for spamming would be a .45 caliber
> sexual sterilization.
>
But why? It's not as if spammers are prime candidates for breeding
anyway...
--
Don Levey $ cd /pub
Framingham, MA $ more beer
NOTE: email server uses spam filters; mail sent to salearn@the-leveys.us
will be used to tune the blocking lists.
|
| | |
Date: 03 Jul 2006 19:19:20
From: Dick Adams
Subject: Re: KILL file for 'trn' on a Unix shell
|
Don Levey <Don_RCB@the-leveys.us > wrote:
> rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams) writes:
>> If it were up to me, the penalty for spamming would be a
>> .45 caliber sexual sterilization.
> But why? It's not as if spammers are prime candidates for
> breeding anyway...
The least productive members of society, taken as a whole,
constitute a pool of high breeders.
End of my participation in this tangent.
Dick
|
|
