| |
Main
Date: 20 Aug 2007 16:27:59
From:
Subject: MI5 Persecution: David Hepworth (1) 26/2/97 (10058)
|
Subject: "Absolute Obscene" David Hepworth (GLR)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,alt.radio.uk,uk.media,uk.media.radio.misc
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Summary:
Keywords:
Last night (21/Feb/97), I was listening to BBC GLR. You have to understand that
I was listening by stealth. Back in 1990 I used to have Capital blaring out of
the speakers all over the garden ("if he listens to Capital then he can't be
all bad", thanks ever so much). But now I listen on my walkman on headphones
with the volume turned right down. It could not possibly be overheard by any
listening device, no matter how sensitive, because sound does not carry from
the headphones.
Yet somehow they are still able to tell which station I am listening to on the
walkman. And last night, I bravely tuned to GLR 94.9FM at around 8.45pm.
Everything went well for the first half hour or so. The DJ (today GLR told me
it was David Hepworth) had a "rock star spelling competition" (how do you spell
Shakespear's Sister?), no trouble there. I was recording the show onto tape
just in case anything unpleasant happened, as I had reason to think it might.
Around 9.10pm, it did. Here, precisely, is what Hepworth said after the song
"Come Around" by the Muttonbirds (I have this on tape, and at some point will
be posting the audio on my website);
"New album's called 'Envy of Angels', that comes out soon, that's the single
that's already out, I would imagine, that's 'Come Around', the Muttonbirds, er,
coming up after this, we got the rock-and-roll A-level, we have, I assume,
Brian do we have an embarrassment of prizes in there, we do, don't we,
(EMPHASIS) absolute obscene (END-EMPHASIS) amounts of prizes, there will no
doubt be a riot at the back door", and that's, er, A-level coming up after this"
The key phrases in what he said are, "EMBARRASSMENT of prizes", and what he
himself emphasized verbally, "ABSOLUTE OBSCENE amount of prizes". It is my
belief (based on content and tone of voice) that when he spoke these phrases he
knew I was listening, and that the phrases refer directly to my situation. The
"EMBARRASSMENT" is the embarrassment he and other media people would feel at
having their wrongdoing exposed; the "ABSOLUTE OBSCENE" (which he verbally
emphasized) described the disgusting sexual abuse which the harassers have been
throwing at me.
Needless to say, I can't prove this is what he meant, although this has
happened enough times that it's hard not to recognise it when you see it. But I
shall be sending him a copy of this explanation. We'll see what he has to say
for himself.
....................................................................
Subject: Re: "Absolute Obscene" David Hepworth (GLR)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,alt.radio.uk,uk.media,uk.media.radio.misc
Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.legal,alt.radio.uk,uk.media,uk.media.radio.misc
References: <E60IAy.CL5.0.bloor@torfree.net > <330f2bac.2665181@nntp.best.com> <331372$
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Distribution:
Anthony@dircon.co.uk-antispam (Anthony) wrote:
>Greg W wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Feb 1997 16:11:22 GMT, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Last night (21/Feb/97), I was listening to BBC GLR. You have to understand
that
>> >I was listening by stealth. Back in 1990 I used to have Capital blaring out
of
[snip]
>> huh?
>
>I can't understand it myself. Can anyone else help us ?
I will try to explain with greater clarity.
I am prone to have ideas of "interactive watching" by people on TV, and
"interactive listening" by people on the radio; which means as I listen to
their programme, they are aware that I am listening (because my home is spied
on, and those doing the spying phone up the radio station and tell them that I
am listening to them), and they then interject nasty remarks in what they say.
This is what I believe may have happened on Friday night with GLR, and what I
was trying to explain in my article.
It's happened before with other radio stations, most worryingly when I am
listening quietly on my walkman as happened on Friday. This time, the
interjected words were "embarrassment" and "absolute obscene". The "absolute
obscene" referred to the abuse which is currently being directed at me.
I hope that's a little clearer.
....................................................................
From: simon@star-one.org.uk (Simon Gray)
Facility thusly:
~ huh?
Just because you need to read it twice in order to understand it, is
that any reason to inflict it on the rest of us again ?
--
'2% of people *do*, 98% of people wish they *had*' - David Fanshawe
http://www.mahayana.demon.co.uk/ Read Flatland !
....................................................................
Mike, try playing a cassette in your walkman. There is no way they can
reach you then. HTH
--
Don Whybrow - Correct email address: don@whybrow.demon.co.uk
....................................................................
Mike Corley wrote:
> ............................ This time, the
> interjected words were "embarrassment" and "absolute obscene". The "absolute
> obscene" referred to the abuse which is currently being directed at me.
But it is possible that those two sets of interjected words could have
validly referred to something else.
> I hope that's a little clearer.
Thank you, it is a bit clearer.
Posted in uk.legal by Anthony@dircon.co.uk
....................................................................
Simon Rushton <Simon@ppushers.demon.co.uk > wrote:
>Some people, new to this group, may not realise the Mike is our resident
>Paranoid Schizophrenic. This is not a joke, it is serious. He has
>already admitted stopping taking prescribed drugs for his condition.
Though I have to say I've never heard one as obscure as that, even
from Mike. How he can believe a rubbish trail for a crap competition
is directed at him is beyond me!
He's sent a copy of the post to the jock, too. I hope he doesn't read
it out.
--
The John Shuttleworth Homepage:
It's just an Austin Ambassador of a site!
http://www.steviep.demon.co.uk/shuttle.htm
....................................................................
10058
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------- >>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
|
| |
Date: 20 Aug 2007 16:59:55
From: Drew Lawson
Subject: Re: Carboy Mishap
|
In article <u_idnbO2QOJhIlTbnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com >
"Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com > writes:
>
>"TARogue" <look@my.sig> wrote in message
>news:slrnfcjdjr.emc.look@gore.tarogue.net...
>> Of course it does. the dairy's brand is what identifies it as belonging
>> to the dairy. If you possess a dairy-branded crate, you are obviously
>> not the rightful owner. No matter how you got it, it still belongs to
>> the dairy as long as it has that dairy's markings.
>
>And if the dairy is out of business? And dairies never surplus out old crates?
It is my understanding that there was a specific federal statute
passed (in the 1990s?) regarding this. And, no, being out of
business would make no difference. The crates could only be sold
to another dairy.
Having said that, I can't track down a specific statute to back up
my claim/memory. (However there certainly are a lot of lawsuits
regarding injuries from using milk crates as stools.)
--
Drew Lawson
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2007 17:09:17
From: Thomas T. Veldhouse
Subject: Re: Carboy Mishap
|
Drew Lawson <drew@furrfu.com > wrote:
>
> It is my understanding that there was a specific federal statute
> passed (in the 1990s?) regarding this. And, no, being out of
> business would make no difference. The crates could only be sold
> to another dairy.
>
> Having said that, I can't track down a specific statute to back up
> my claim/memory. (However there certainly are a lot of lawsuits
> regarding injuries from using milk crates as stools.)
>
Yes, please do supply a citation. What a complete waste of tax payers money
such a statutes passage would be.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the
machinations of the wicked.
|
|
